Breaking barriers : The power of constructive dialogue

In my previous article “Collision Course: A difficult conversation that bombed the project”, I had illustrated how a conversation can go wrong and its fallout.

Below is a step-by-step way Ravi can prepare, approach and manage the conversation more effectively. Ravi would need to approach the conversation with preparation, emotional intelligence, and a collaborative mindset. Here’s a detailed guide to how he could have handled the conversation with Priya, and how the conflict could have played out differently.

Ravi should prepare thoroughly before initiating the conversation with Priya.

Here are the steps he can follow:

• Clarify the Objective

Ravi’s goal is not to assign blame, but to resolve the ongoing quality and delivery issues, improve collaboration, and protect the relationship with Vanguard Enterprises.

Key Objective: Identify root causes of the delays and quality issues, and work together to develop a joint solution.

• Gather Data and Facts

Ravi can collect specific data regarding missed deadlines, quality defects, and delays that have occurred. These need to be facts, not opinions, to avoid making the conversation personal.

He can also review communication between teams to understand whether his team may have contributed to the problem, showing willingness to take some accountability.

• Anticipate Priya’s Perspective

Ravi can put himself in Priya’s shoes and consider what challenges her team might be facing (staff shortages, rushed timelines, unclear requirements).

By anticipating her viewpoint, Ravi can prepare to acknowledge her concerns, which will make her more receptive to a constructive discussion.

• Plan for Solutions, Not Just Criticism

Instead of focusing on what went wrong, Ravi can come prepared with potential solutions. For example, he could suggest ways to improve communication between teams or request more realistic timelines for testing.

Approach and Conversation Steps

Ravi can follow these steps to ensure a productive conversation:

• Set a Collaborative Tone

Ravi can invite Priya to meet in a neutral setting with an invitation that signals collaboration: “Priya, I think we need to discuss the recent issues affecting our teams. I’d like us to find a way to work better together to fix the problems and ensure Vanguard is satisfied.”

• Begin with Empathy and Understanding

Ravi can start the conversation by acknowledging the challenges Priya’s team may be facing: “I understand that your team has been under a lot of pressure with tight deadlines and that there have been some staff shortages. I can imagine that’s made things difficult on your end.”

• Present the Facts Calmly and Objectively

Rather than launching into accusations, Ravi can lay out the facts: “Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen some issues with delivery and quality that have impacted the client’s trust in us. For instance, the feature that failed during last week’s demo was identified as having several bugs during our final integration. I want to work with you to understand how we can prevent this from happening again.”

• Invite Priya’s Perspective

Ravi can give Priya space to express her side of the story. “I’d really like to hear from you about what might be causing these delays and quality issues. Are there specific challenges your team is facing that we can address?”

• Collaborate on Solutions

Ravi can then suggest some ideas, but also encourage Priya to share hers: “One idea I had was to set up more frequent check-ins between our teams so we can identify potential issues earlier in the process. What do you think would help from your side?”

• Agree on Clear, Actionable Steps

Once both parties have shared their views and collaborated on solutions, Ravi can ensure that clear next steps are defined. “So, to make sure we’re aligned, moving forward we’ll establish more detailed handover documentation from my team, and your team will conduct a brief quality check within 24 hours. Let’s set up weekly reviews to track our progress.”

• End on a Positive and Forward-Looking Note

Ravi can close the conversation with a positive outlook: “I really appreciate your openness, Priya. I think by working more closely, we can turn things around and deliver a better outcome for Vanguard.”

By applying the above principles, lets see how the Conversation Plays Out Differently!

---

Ravi sat at the table, waiting for Priya. He knew this conversation could go one of two ways—either they would both leave more frustrated, or they would find a way to resolve the mess that had been plaguing both of their teams for weeks.

When Priya entered the room, Ravi greeted her with a nod. He started with a calm tone, “Priya, thanks for making the time. I know things have been tough recently, and we’ve both been under a lot of pressure to deliver for Vanguard.”

Priya’s expression softened slightly. She had expected a confrontation but wasn’t getting one—yet. She sat down, crossing her arms but not as defensively as she might have.

Ravi continued, “I wanted to discuss the quality and delivery issues that have been coming up. We’re hearing complaints from the client, and it’s starting to strain the relationship. I know it’s not all on your team—my team has had its share of issues too—but I think if we understand what’s happening on both sides, we can solve this together.”

Priya looked surprised. She was ready to defend her team, but Ravi’s tone shifted the conversation. “I agree,” she said cautiously, “but we’ve been under extreme pressure. The deadlines are too tight, and my team doesn’t get enough time to do thorough testing.”

“I hear you,” Ravi responded. “We’ve had to push the delivery dates hard to meet the client’s demands, and I know that’s put strain on your testing cycle. I’ve noticed that some of the features we hand off aren’t as polished as they should be either, which only adds to your burden.”

Priya nodded, relaxing slightly. “Exactly. We need better coordination. When things come to us last-minute, there’s only so much we can do.”

Ravi leaned forward, his voice calm but direct. “What if we try to build in a bit more buffer for testing and do earlier check-ins between our teams? That way, we can catch issues sooner and adjust if needed.”

“That could help,” Priya agreed. “I also think if we can get clearer requirements upfront, we can avoid some of the last-minute changes that throw us off.”

“I’ll work on that,” Ravi said. “Let’s agree to weekly check-ins for now, and I’ll make sure our team gets you clearer documentation and requirements early on. If we run into any issues, we’ll flag them right away. Does that sound good?”

Priya smiled faintly, relieved that the conversation hadn’t spiralled into blame. “Yeah, I think that could work. I appreciate that you’re willing to find a solution together.”

They shook hands before leaving the room. Both felt a sense of relief—there was now a plan in place, and the tension that had been building for weeks had dissipated. The project wasn’t out of the woods yet, but for the first time, both Ravi and Priya felt they were on the same side.

By preparing carefully, starting with empathy, and focusing on collaboration, Ravi transformed what could have been a destructive confrontation into a productive conversation. Instead of further damaging their relationship and the project, both Ravi and Priya left the conversation with clear next steps and a stronger working relationship. This approach not only resolved the current issue but set a foundation for better communication and cooperation in the future.

If you want to develop the art of powerful constructive dialogue, want to break barriers and handle challenging conversations better, then reach out and we can find a way!